|
Post by SeriouslyStupid on Jul 7, 2002 22:52:11 GMT -5
I just want want to know when are you self-centered, me-generation asshole 996 drivers going to wake up and realize that it's NEVER only you on the road? You really do have a problem with 996 drivers don't you? Why do you feel the need to generalize 996 owners like this?
|
|
E. J.
Full Member
Posts: 150
|
Post by E. J. on Jul 8, 2002 6:12:13 GMT -5
I'm not generalizing 996 drivers at all. I am only talking about a few bad apples that are ruining the bunch. You and other 996 drivers like you (not all 996 drivers certainly) are giving all 911 and Porsche owners a bad name. If you think I am the only one who feels this way you better pull your head out of the sand. Heck, I have a few friends with 996s, but they are responsible and go to the track to let 'er rip.
No Stupid, I am talking about 996 owners like you and some others (like the one this thread was started about) that will NEVER accept responsibility for their actions. The Ken Lays of the 996 community.
Oh, and way to answer my questions.
|
|
|
Post by FixedWing on Jul 9, 2002 13:55:47 GMT -5
Seems to me that SD is just following through on what you and Stupid and even Petey think: "is it really breaking the law if you don't get caught?" Speeding is braking the law just as breaking into someone else's computer is braking the law. Why do you think that this is so difficult? My point was that you are no better than they are (and in fact, you are committing a felony, they're probably committing an infraction). I don't understand. Are you trying to justify criminal behavour? Our governments decide what is criminal behavour. You don't get to pick and choose based upon which of the laws you like and don't like. This all seems very warped to me. By the way, I have no "friends". I'm universally detested by all (at least when they don't just ignore me). S.
|
|
|
Post by The Pope on Jul 9, 2002 14:11:21 GMT -5
Speeding is braking the law just as breaking into someone else's computer is braking the law. Why do you think that this is so difficult? My point was that you are no better than they are (and in fact, you are committing a felony, they're probably committing an infraction). S. Who broke into whose computer?
|
|
E. J.
Full Member
Posts: 150
|
Post by E. J. on Jul 9, 2002 14:45:46 GMT -5
I don't understand. Are you trying to justify criminal behavour? Our governments decide what is criminal behavour. You don't get to pick and choose based upon which of the laws you like and don't like. Ah ha. Of course I am not condoning criminal behavior, but it seems you and your cohorts with new 911s are by snapping digital pictures showing 170 mph on public highways. It's actually quite funny how you think SD is breaking the law, but not the jackass that started all this nonsense in the first place. By the way, while I wish I could wax as eloquently as SD, but alas, I am not him or her. In fact, I don't know who it is. I am just siding with the voice of reason. Do you like posting here so much because your old traditional home has been torn down and rebuilt as a modern condo? I am sorry that you lost your home.
|
|
|
Post by FixedWing on Jul 9, 2002 23:31:59 GMT -5
it seems you and your cohorts with new 911s are by snapping digital pictures showing 170 mph on public highways. I haven't snapped any pictures showing 170 mph on public highways. If I ever did snap such photos it would be in km/h and not MPH and it would be perfectly legal when I took the photo. I spent most of Monday in Germany on roads without speed restrictions and I'm in Germany quite frequently. I don't cohort with anyone. S.
|
|
|
Post by FixedWing on Jul 9, 2002 23:33:28 GMT -5
Who broke into whose computer? Check the history on this thread for claims to have broken into and pilfered through other's computers. S.
|
|
E. J.
Full Member
Posts: 150
|
Post by E. J. on Jul 10, 2002 9:00:18 GMT -5
I don't cohort with anyone. I know - cohort is a noun not a verb.
|
|
E. J.
Full Member
Posts: 150
|
Post by E. J. on Jul 10, 2002 9:05:04 GMT -5
Check the history on this thread for claims to have broken into and pilfered through other's computers. S. Can you provide some proof of this other than some rambling on a message board? The old 996 double standard rears its ugly head again. The web board is not incriminating when the crime is speeding, but when it's a different crime not committed by your cohort then lock the purpotrator away and throw away the key. You keep proving my point that laws don't apply to you 996 guys. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by SeriousDriver on Jul 10, 2002 9:38:03 GMT -5
Check the history on this thread for claims to have broken into and pilfered through other's computers. S. Can you say "JOKE". You are amazing with your seriousness. It was a little trap. Let me explain - SeriouslyStupid can claim that his PC was broken into by me, but only by admitting my info was correct - he has to admit to having gay porn on his PC. If he has no gay porn, then he knows it was a trap. I assumed he does not have gay porn on his PC, but if he does, that is just a coincidence. I didn't break into his PC or even attempt that. I am not into illegal stuff - Now I think I'll go get my video camera and go for a really fast drive or find a street race. (For those lacking a sense of humor - that was another joke.)
|
|
|
Post by FixedWing on Jul 10, 2002 12:33:12 GMT -5
Oh! It was a JOKE!!! So you didn't really break into private computers and rummage through their private parts and commit fellonies in the name of decency and justice for all like you said you did? Oh, I feel like such a fool. I have been taken in by your little joke, sucked dry and made to look the naive. I am so humiliated. You got me. S.
|
|
|
Post by FixedWing on Jul 10, 2002 12:44:42 GMT -5
The web board is not incriminating when the crime is speeding, but when it's a different crime... Sorry for being so serious again but ... This is strictly speaking wrong. Claims made on the web are evidence which tend to show the truth of the facts claimed. That evidence would need to be evaluated by the trier of fact. This is true for speeding or any other crime. The problem with speeding is that there are many elements to a successful prosecution and the evidence doesn't tend to prove all of those elements. Fortunately, breaking into private computers has fewer elements and is a lot easier to prove. S.
|
|
E. J.
Full Member
Posts: 150
|
Post by E. J. on Jul 10, 2002 12:57:22 GMT -5
Fortunately, breaking into private computers has fewer elements and is a lot easier to prove. Are you nuts? It's easier to prove that someone broke into your computer? The only time you would EVER be able to prove it is if the hacker wanted you to know or if he was just a poorly skilled hacker. Not many of the latter running around out there. What happened to the hackers who hacked the FBI a few years ago. Still not in jail. Just one example.
|
|
|
Post by FixedWing on Jul 10, 2002 13:48:23 GMT -5
What happened to the hackers who hacked the FBI a few years ago. Still not in jail. Just one example. Yeah, but he wasn't dumb enough to confess all on P-car.com! S.
|
|
|
Post by SeriousDriver on Jul 10, 2002 15:25:08 GMT -5
Yeah, but he wasn't dumb enough to confess all on P-car.com! S. You have an amazing grasp of Internet law. Will you represent me when SeriouslyStupid has me arrested and shows the world his gay porn?
|
|